Oct
03
03
The State of the Union
See, this is where I give my thoughts on the State of the Union address.
Hmmm. I don’t like speeches. Rather, I don’t like watching them. Just let me scan the text at my own pace, thank you, without having to sit through the slow, direct cadence of speech and the laborious applause after every other syllable my dog lick my dick.
Overall, I suppse it was a good speech, as speeches go, though I was decidedly disappointed by the lack of declarations of war. There wasn’t a single one, after all. The whole time I was watching it, I was thinking to myself, “Any minute now, he’s gonna get that twinkle in his eye and say, ‘Ok, boys, let’s drop this hammer!’”
Meh, so that didn’t happen. I guess I can wait until Feb. 6th female pig fucking.
I have to say, I liked this bit:
To date we have arrested or otherwise dealt with many key commanders of Al Qaida.
Heh. “Otherwise dealt with,” eh? That’s a rather civilized way of sayin’ we aired the fuckers out. And people say Bush is an uncouth cowboy. beastiality slavegirls..
As for all the domestic pork that went in the barrel, I’ll just shrug for now. There are more important things, and Bush is doing the Big Right Thing at least in aggressively supporting tax cuts. It’s one of the things that most decisively separates usfrom the economic philosophies of most of the rest of the world, especially Europe, and it’s the movement in that direction that will ensure our increased prosperity and leading economic edge while Europe drifts further into stagnation.
Don’t get me wrong, personal tax cuts are only a small thing in the grand scheme of things, but they indicate the correct philosophy, and a willingness to pursue hardcore dog sex. How all this sits with the various new social programs Bush has proposd, eh… who knows?
A billion dollars for research into hydrogen fuel? I’m not qualified to pronounce on the scientific viability, but in general I’m more happy when government money goes into research, even bloated research, rather than increasing bloated social programs.
Overall, about what I expected: he’s still there, he’s still in control, he’s still focused and determined on the big issues. Folks can disagree reasonably about whether we need a welfare state, but that argument comes after Saddam Hussein and those like him are dead and gone and we don’t have to worry about nuclear suitcases incinerating cities.
The article also points to this site, which maintains a running clock of how long it will be until Mitnick can startway why we're doing all of this, and why, if they still choose to berate us about "root causes" and "birds coming home
"The death of that man is a religious duty, but his case should not be tied to the Christian community," Shabestari,
During the last half of the 20th century, this principle was expanded internationally through the United Nations. The U.N.
Maybe I can't change the fact that I have to be intimately confronted with the death and pain in order to really feel the
rather than submit to infamy or see those that are dear to him suffer wrong.
without regard to whether the loss is due to the growth of a heartless and all-absorbing commercialism,
The article also points to this site, which maintains a running clock of how long it will be until Mitnick can start
Heh. Didn't Nostradamus write something about "a bespeckled plague rising in the West..."?
Iranian cleric Mohsen Mojtahed Shabestari, addressing weekly Friday prayers in the northwestern town of Tabriz, said
a representative of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted as saying.
I mean come on, when you're arguing with someone who's just going to call you a Nazi when you spend 2,000 words making
obviously they have lost loved ones or friends."
But I am thankful that at least for now, I've been able to summon that deep-seated, personal wrath so appropriate to an
support (in the small, mostly insignificant ways that are possible for one such as myself)
I strongly suspect TR had access to some sort of time machine and traveled into the furture about a hundred years.
of constant uncertainty and increased insecurity where almost anything could lead to war.
Sorry folks, but slippery slope arguments don't hold water by themselves. We're going after Saddam because he 1) has shown
After 3000 of your countrymen die in a couple hours, anything less than that is wont to be downplayed in significance
Wheeler Hall last spring.
getting an education. When she tried to talk to one of the organizers after her test about how some people were just
The Muslim world -- whose support is vital to any real effort to end the causes of terrorism -- is adamantly opposed.
I'll get a chance to ask why they've been glorifying images of Hamas murderers on their flyers.
So welcome. If this is the first and/or only post you can see, it means I haven't imported my archives from Blogspot yet,
It may be a sad illustration of my lack to find sympathy within myself without reading descriptions or seeing pictures,
Anyway, take the new site for a test drive. Take her easy on the clutch and go steady on the hills, and I think you'll
to the San Francisco federal building to protest the passage of Bush's resolution for action against Iraq.
for the life of me, cannot see it. The news showed a clip of a guy trying politely to walk around a woman so self-righteous
you could see stink lines of self-satisfaction coming off her so that he could simply get to his job. She of course started
vulnerability.
"What I found personally to be true was that it's easier to manipulate people rather than technology," he said.
The article also points to this site, which maintains a running clock of how long it will be until Mitnick can start
Heh. Didn't Nostradamus write something about "a bespeckled plague rising in the West..."?
cause, but I,
Well that's not really true. People on a different side of the debate than I are not necessarily jerks, just wrong.
Whereas the Cold War doctrine of deterrence and containment rested on strength, the new idea of pre-emption insists on U.S.
serves? As far as I can tell, all they did was take some people who were probably overwhelmingly against the war anyway,
and make them wish that congress had instead passed a resolution authorizing military force against people
I have to admit I'm pretty curious just to see what he's going to do. The guy has shown himself to have an overpowering
curiosity that trumps any sort of legal resriction placed on him, but it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that he's
After 3000 of your countrymen die in a couple hours, anything less than that is wont to be downplayed in significance
only be revealed as more useless than it already seems), there is right now a coalition prepared to go into Iraq with the
For that reason and others, I didn't actually start reading the news coverage until this morning.
and eastern Europe, Australia and the middle east. Is that not multilateralism?
Containment and deterrence were responses to US weakness, you silly-headed dunderpate. It was obvious that using direct
nuclear weapons. Containment was born out of a realization that we were effectively restrained by our lack of strategic
destroying the technological infrastructure of Western civilization again. And it's only 3 months away!
curiosity that trumps any sort of legal resriction placed on him, but it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that he's
One middle-aged woman who looked like she hadn't combed her hair since Jerry Garcia died had this to say, when asked
when you apply your own internal calculus of death and suffering and conclude that it isn't something that you need
to really concern yourself with, except in a somewhat general, theoretical way.
For that reason and others, I didn't actually start reading the news coverage until this morning.
However, several of the exchanges I have had have definately been with those you might describe as "challeneged" in
Containment and deterrence were responses to US weakness, you silly-headed dunderpate. It was obvious that using direct
I tried to present my ideas in an honest and truthful way, and not be seriously offensive, even when he acted in ways
When they aired some actual interviews with the protesters, I started to honestly think they were part of some sort of
lap dance.
why she thought there weren't more stories about protests going on in the news, "Well, because the media is corporately
Already, even if the UN thumbs its irrelevant nose at the idea of going after Iraq (and if it actually does, then they'll
"A bunch of people died from terrorism over the weekend? Sure, that's awful, but we all knew this was going to happen
The experience made me think of the instructions from all corners of the media after 9/11 that what we, as Americans,
vulnerability.
use grown-up scissors), but nevertheless, even though he really didn't deserve it,
that blatantly called for some rhetorical bitch-slapping.
Shiite Muslim clerics in Lebanon and Iran have reacted with rage at the Rev. Jerry Falwell for calling Islam's prophet
curiosity that trumps any sort of legal resriction placed on him, but it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that he's
why she thought there weren't more stories about protests going on in the news, "Well, because the media is corporately
Already, even if the UN thumbs its irrelevant nose at the idea of going after Iraq (and if it actually does, then they'll
US: Italy, Australia, Poland, Spain, Qatar, Kuwait and, of course, Britain. I know it's hard to find out this kind of
Whereas the Cold War doctrine of deterrence and containment rested on strength, the new idea of pre-emption insists on U.S.
Well I wouldn't be surprised if this Wednesday at Sproul there will be similar behavior, and I plan to be there. Maybe
I urge anyone in the bay area who has the time on the 16th to come as well and lend credence with your example to the
alternative economy." I suppose that's better PR than saying they want to impose a grab bag full of sociialistic silliness
Anyway, take the new site for a test drive. Take her easy on the clutch and go steady on the hills, and I think you'll
democratically decided laws - - not the capriciousness of individual rulers -- should govern human affairs.
looks like a green light, no?
a careful, precise argument, what point is there in engaging them verbally anymore?
A taste, just a taste...
(or to have their genitalia eviscerated by a rabid Rosie O'Donnell
I'll get a chance to ask why they've been glorifying images of Hamas murderers on their flyers.
50 Ways to Leave Your Folly Common Dreams, that goldmine of general silliness, showcases this piece, The Folly of Pre-emptive
but I hope to do that soon. I also hope to win the Nobel Prize in Kickboxing, and judge each of those things to be of
Replace "powerful" with "crazy and armed with nukes" and you'd be right. Otherwise, your statement is nonsense.
Another Australian tourist, 18-year-old Rachel Hughes, said she and her boyfriend had just arrived in Kuta when the blast
looks like a green light, no?
I'm going to be checking the weather channel for reports of snowflakes in Hell, but meanwhile you should go read it now.
Well I'm far far far too petty a person to do that.
and you'll get diversity in the speech by the politician, in the one by the principal who welcomes him and in the one by
be replacing the old site that was hosted on that evil of evils, that bane of banes, that something-really-awful of
fact that these people are thugs, bullies and liars.
War, by three fellows that hail from Global Exchange. You know who I'm talking about. The folks that want to "build an
economic stupidity, especially when their ideas would do such a better job of it by themselves. Case in point:
occurred, smashing the window of their hotel room.
weapons inspections in Iraq represent a good example of how the rule of law has been used, and can be used again, to avert
Now at this point, most people would just say, "let it go, and move on."
find testimonials to diversity. Flip through any recent social sciences or humanities textbook and diversity pops up with
I'll get a chance to ask why they've been glorifying images of Hamas murderers on their flyers.
be replacing the old site that was hosted on that evil of evils, that bane of banes, that something-really-awful of
the world to stomach the imperial scent of our newly enunciated military doctrine that proposes pre- emption of any powerful
it is shoved, in all its detailed horror, right into my face.
Falwell was a "mercenary and must be killed," the Farsi-language daily Abrar reported Saturday.
University or Diversity
I'm going to be checking the weather channel for reports of snowflakes in Hell, but meanwhile you should go read it now.
getting an education. When she tried to talk to one of the organizers after her test about how some people were just
In your face, Space Coyote!
I finally went and did it.
Heaven forfend them not being on board with us!
the world to stomach the imperial scent of our newly enunciated military doctrine that proposes pre- emption of any powerful
rivals.
a representative of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted as saying.
University or Diversity
I see. Did you talk to this "everyone" at your International Socialist Organization direct action planning seminar or
trying to get an education
Well I wouldn't be surprised if this Wednesday at Sproul there will be similar behavior, and I plan to be there. Maybe
be replacing the old site that was hosted on that evil of evils, that bane of banes, that something-really-awful of
50 Ways to Leave Your Folly Common Dreams, that goldmine of general silliness, showcases this piece, The Folly of Pre-emptive
rivals.
Another Australian tourist, 18-year-old Rachel Hughes, said she and her boyfriend had just arrived in Kuta when the blast
occurred, smashing the window of their hotel room.
looks like a green light, no?
Now at this point, most people would just say, "let it go, and move on."
A taste, just a taste...
I finally went and did it.
something-really-awfuls, BlogSpot.
the world to stomach the imperial scent of our newly enunciated military doctrine that proposes pre- emption of any powerful
Replace "powerful" with "crazy and armed with nukes" and you'd be right. Otherwise, your statement is nonsense.
"The death of that man is a religious duty, but his case should not be tied to the Christian community," Shabestari,
a representative of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted as saying.
I mean come on, when you're arguing with someone who's just going to call you a Nazi when you spend 2,000 words making
the way. Apparently that wasn't enough for the however, because they then started pulling at her legs to keep her from
and that it wasn't fair for these people to stop them, the girl started literally screaming at her about selfish she was.
Well, being the abject conformist that I am, I would like to welcome all new and oldcomers to my new blog, which will
That is, until this morning. Now I'm glad to say that I've gotten over getting over it, and am thoroughly pissed again.
the world to stomach the imperial scent of our newly enunciated military doctrine that proposes pre- emption of any powerful
a terrorist and an envoy of Iran's supreme leader reportedly called for his death.
"The death of that man is a religious duty, but his case should not be tied to the Christian community," Shabestari,
to all of you warmongering neanderthals" tone of voice. She then struck a pose of righteous exasperation when she asked
Wheeler Hall last spring.
getting an education. When she tried to talk to one of the organizers after her test about how some people were just
I suppose you mean that it's not "multilateralist" unless France says so?
I was already in a state of "moving on" and being "over it" before I even heard about the Bali attacks, with the result
that blatantly called for some rhetorical bitch-slapping.
Russia and shit. Besides, it's just the Russians. Why don't we just contain them or something? Hey, who's up for some
lap dance.
the Feds know about it.
"A bunch of people died from terrorism over the weekend? Sure, that's awful, but we all knew this was going to happen
"A bunch of people died from terrorism over the weekend? Sure, that's awful, but we all knew this was going to happen
In fact, the idea of pre- emptive attack depends on fear. It presupposes insecurity and assumes we will always be threatened.
You must be triple jointed to be able to twist words like that.
nuclear weapons. Containment was born out of a realization that we were effectively restrained by our lack of strategic
and make them wish that congress had instead passed a resolution authorizing military force against people
I have to admit I'm pretty curious just to see what he's going to do. The guy has shown himself to have an overpowering
One middle-aged woman who looked like she hadn't combed her hair since Jerry Garcia died had this to say, when asked
Don't you people ever get tired of just pulling shit out of your asses?
again soon, didn't we?"
information with your heads crammed so far up your asses, so I'll give you a pass.
I suppose you mean that it's not "multilateralist" unless France says so?
that extended anger and sadness bring, or maybe even from just the fact that my threshold of human suffering sufficient
Heaven forfend them not being on board with us!
we could go and stop the Soviets and all their expansionist hijinks, but then we'd like, have to go all the way over to
a terrorist and an envoy of Iran's supreme leader reportedly called for his death.
"The death of that man is a religious duty, but his case should not be tied to the Christian community," Shabestari,
some of their cohorts are actually being held accountable by the university for their disruptive, illegal actions at
To quote a boozed up, cynical and misanthropic individual whom I greatly admire: "Making fun of these people is like
The experience made me think of the instructions from all corners of the media after 9/11 that what we, as Americans,
that extended anger and sadness bring, or maybe even from just the fact that my threshold of human suffering sufficient
Containment and deterrence were responses to US weakness, you silly-headed dunderpate. It was obvious that using direct
superiority.
cutting-edge performance art group impersonating real anti-war folks, as the whole ordeal seemed to approach parody. No,
curiosity that trumps any sort of legal resriction placed on him, but it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that he's
After 3000 of your countrymen die in a couple hours, anything less than that is wont to be downplayed in significance
only be revealed as more useless than it already seems), there is right now a coalition prepared to go into Iraq with the
or any other simply crappy country in the world, because none of them satisfy both those propositions.
side of the political spectrum... what are they called?
"The lethal combination is when you exploit both people and technology," Mr Mitnick told BBC News Online.
serves? As far as I can tell, all they did was take some people who were probably overwhelmingly against the war anyway,
I strongly suspect TR had access to some sort of time machine and traveled into the furture about a hundred years.
Bush also spoke of an "international coalition" that would disarm Hussein. Bush knows the American public is loathe to
course grew out of the experience of 9/11.
so that he will be better equipped to fulfill point 1). Show me another nation that's like that today.
What it does not mean however, is that this suddenly signals that we are going to be going after China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba
lying in order to gain information that gave him access to restricted systems.
Eventually he got a little ticked off and said roughly, "Get away from me!" I was hungrily anticipating the energetic dissenter
No nation deserves to exist if it permits itself to lose the stern and virile virtues; and this
Saddam will use these nukes when he gets them, whether that use takes the form of vaporizing a city or merely being hung
Really, how often is someone able to so perfectly crystallize the dilemmas that will exist a century in the future
But for now if you all don't mind, I'd just like to stew in my rage for a while, and remind myself in a truly visceral
Sorry folks, but slippery slope arguments don't hold water by themselves. We're going after Saddam because he 1) has shown
to the San Francisco federal building to protest the passage of Bush's resolution for action against Iraq.
has been built up around Mitnick, a basically curious guy who just as often used old face-to-face (or voice-to-voice)
which is all about the biggest threat to the security of all companies: their own employees.
And exactly how do you go from no "final proof" to there being no evidence of impending aggression? The very fact that
without regard to whether the loss is due to the growth of a heartless and all-absorbing commercialism,
The article also points to this site, which maintains a running clock of how long it will be until Mitnick can start
I have to admit I'm pretty curious just to see what he's going to do. The guy has shown himself to have an overpowering
Bush also spoke of an "international coalition" that would disarm Hussein. Bush knows the American public is loathe to
After 3000 of your countrymen die in a couple hours, anything less than that is wont to be downplayed in significance
Don't you people ever get tired of just pulling shit out of your asses?
US: Italy, Australia, Poland, Spain, Qatar, Kuwait and, of course, Britain. I know it's hard to find out this kind of
Whereas the Cold War doctrine of deterrence and containment rested on strength, the new idea of pre-emption insists on U.S.
You must be triple jointed to be able to twist words like that.
"What I found personally to be true was that it's easier to manipulate people rather than technology," he said.
destroying the technological infrastructure of Western civilization again. And it's only 3 months away!
Really, how often is someone able to so perfectly crystallize the dilemmas that will exist a century in the future
Quite the contrary, Bush's aggressive rhetoric, disregard for international law, and his lack of any vision other than war
After 3000 of your countrymen die in a couple hours, anything less than that is wont to be downplayed in significance
of fist.
Well that's not really true. People on a different side of the debate than I are not necessarily jerks, just wrong.
In fact, the idea of pre- emptive attack depends on fear. It presupposes insecurity and assumes we will always be threatened.
he revealed himself to be a seriously dishonest debater (that, or he was so stupid that it wouldn't be safe for him to
Now could someone please tell me what concrete purpose that woman's behavior, and that of her great chanting unwashed bretheren,
When they aired some actual interviews with the protesters, I started to honestly think they were part of some sort of
psychopathic fancy without fear of retribution.
In theory, I was of course angry, but I had a vaguely detatched sense about the whole thing. A large part of that of
If and when you find one, that means that I'll be perfectly willing to advocate an attack against them as well.
or any other simply crappy country in the world, because none of them satisfy both those propositions.
you could see stink lines of self-satisfaction coming off her so that he could simply get to his job. She of course started
Eventually he got a little ticked off and said roughly, "Get away from me!" I was hungrily anticipating the energetic dissenter
Now could someone please tell me what concrete purpose that woman's behavior, and that of her great chanting unwashed bretheren,
"to prolonged indulgence in luxury and soft, effortless ease, or to the deification of a warped and twisted sentimentality"?
Really, how often is someone able to so perfectly crystallize the dilemmas that will exist a century in the future
way why we're doing all of this, and why, if they still choose to berate us about "root causes" and "birds coming home
so that he will be better equipped to fulfill point 1). Show me another nation that's like that today.
At the very least, don't let me hear any of these things when you're standing in my presence, unless you want a faceful
has been built up around Mitnick, a basically curious guy who just as often used old face-to-face (or voice-to-voice)
Eventually he got a little ticked off and said roughly, "Get away from me!" I was hungrily anticipating the energetic dissenter
vaunted proof of yours. Then you could be really sure.
they're done, hang them on his wall next to the framed heads of Iraqi dissidents and say to himself, "Well, I can check
The article also points to this site, which maintains a running clock of how long it will be until Mitnick can start
cutting-edge performance art group impersonating real anti-war folks, as the whole ordeal seemed to approach parody. No,
Quite the contrary, Bush's aggressive rhetoric, disregard for international law, and his lack of any vision other than war
Don't you people ever get tired of just pulling shit out of your asses?
If and when you find one, that means that I'll be perfectly willing to advocate an attack against them as well.
you could see stink lines of self-satisfaction coming off her so that he could simply get to his job. She of course started
chanting in his face and moved in front of him every time he tried to get around her.
And exactly how do you go from no "final proof" to there being no evidence of impending aggression? The very fact that
that off my list of things to do. Now, on to learning how to square-dance."
over the heads of the world's nations as threat so that he can act willy-nilly in whatever new adventure captures his
Please. I can't swing around a dead Saddam on a rope without hitting this argument these days. At bottom, it's a slippery
Sorry folks, but slippery slope arguments don't hold water by themselves. We're going after Saddam because he 1) has shown
to the San Francisco federal building to protest the passage of Bush's resolution for action against Iraq.
has been built up around Mitnick, a basically curious guy who just as often used old face-to-face (or voice-to-voice)
let you know when there's a mushroom cloud over New York, because that's the only "final proof" that seems to be able to
We despise and abhor the bully, the brawler, the oppressor, whether in private or public life, but
But I am thankful that at least for now, I've been able to summon that deep-seated, personal wrath so appropriate to an
them into a thin paste of protein on a cave wall, to wipe out every last vestige of the disgusting stain they have left
By tossing out any reasonable standards of evidence as a prerequisite for military action, the White House puts us in a state
slope proposition, claiming that because we go after Saddam, we'll suddenly be all aggro-ed up to obliterate any country
You mean everyone in America aren't like San Franciscans?
by both Instapundit and Cold Fury (and probably by sundry others by now):
threaten the United States, he said we must "assume the worst." Essentially, the White House is proposing that the
We despise and abhor the bully, the brawler, the oppressor, whether in private or public life, but
I guess not. The fact that the UN is anything but democratic since the vast majority of countries represented there do not
the efforts to find these people and eradicate them, to ferret them out from their cowardly hiding places and vaporize
faith at large, since many of them are peaceful, albeit intellectually stunted, people.
My sentences, thus decreed, will be subsequently carried out by my elite brigade of Beheading Gnomes, whom I made up
be harried by idiots who have full compliments of heads and genitals! With the ranks of my imaginary gnomes rallied,
agree that [insert additional badly-forced car metaphor here]!
threaten the United States, he said we must "assume the worst." Essentially, the White House is proposing that the
obviously they have lost loved ones or friends."
making a point of reading in depth about any such future atrocity to ensure that I don't allow myself to be instantly "over it."
Diversity. More than motherhood, it is the one unassailable concept these days. Open any teaching publication, and you will
and you'll get diversity in the speech by the politician, in the one by the principal who welcomes him and in the one by
on the civilized world. And when I resort again to that frame of mind, it will be because I realize, intellectually and
But for now if you all don't mind, I'd just like to stew in my rage for a while, and remind myself in a truly visceral
Sorry folks, but slippery slope arguments don't hold water by themselves. We're going after Saddam because he 1) has shown
nothing may stand in our way!
cause, but I,
Yes, well I suppose you're suggesting that we would be well-served to wait for this "final proof," then? Very well. I'll
rather than submit to infamy or see those that are dear to him suffer wrong.
act such as this. In a few days or weeks, I'm sure it will subside to a colder, more focused resolution to continue to
Hey, didn't there used to be a city where this smoking crater is?
But for now if you all don't mind, I'd just like to stew in my rage for a while, and remind myself in a truly visceral
It is time for a new day to dawn in the Blogosphere, my gnome brothers. A glorious day. A day when no longer will we
You mean everyone in America aren't like San Franciscans?
...but there's no shame in being a follower when those you're following make such damn good points.
Peace is generally good in itself, but it is never the highest good unless it comes as the handmaid
let you know when there's a mushroom cloud over New York, because that's the only "final proof" that seems to be able to
And at most, UN weapons inspectors have delayed conflict by a few years, not averted it. In actualyity, I think they have
really just put Saddam in a better situation than he was before because the presence of inspectors invites complacency and
"I said it's being taken care of, dammit. Mind your own business."
Finally, long after the fad has grown tiresome, everyone's attention turns to another scrap of dogma for the next decade.
but they make up for any lack of actual existence with pure unadulterated enthusiasm.
You mean everyone in America aren't like San Franciscans?
Such as this quote by Teddy Roosevelt concerning his acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize, posted now
Yes, well I suppose you're suggesting that we would be well-served to wait for this "final proof," then? Very well. I'll
anger that is so justifiable -no, demanded- by these despicable acts, but if that must be the case, then from on, I'll be
And at most, UN weapons inspectors have delayed conflict by a few years, not averted it. In actualyity, I think they have
Hey, didn't there used to be a city where this smoking crater is?
If a good education is meant to produce independent thinkers, I've seen precious little evidence it does. Education is
Finally, long after the fad has grown tiresome, everyone's attention turns to another scrap of dogma for the next decade.
Anyway, take the new site for a test drive. Take her easy on the clutch and go steady on the hills, and I think you'll
Sure, it'd be nice to be a leader...
coming off them. It was really a terrible sight," she said. "You could just hear people crying up in the Bounty foyer -
obviously they have lost loved ones or friends."
have democratically elected rulers I'm sure doesn't throw any flies into your ointment.
jerkwad I encounter, an order for them to be beheaded with extreme prejudice until the the point at which they are dead
(or to have their genitalia eviscerated by a rabid Rosie O'Donnell
something-really-awfuls, BlogSpot.
of a lack of imagination or basic humanity; the fact that it's difficult for me to feel deeply for people suffering unless
One of the great advances of the modern era has been the spread of the rule of law. This is the now common idea that
not just "fear," as if we're going to indiscriminantly nuke the floor under our beds because monsters might be hiding there.
weapons inspections in Iraq represent a good example of how the rule of law has been used, and can be used again, to avert
Maybe I can't change the fact that I have to be intimately confronted with the death and pain in order to really feel the
have democratically elected rulers I'm sure doesn't throw any flies into your ointment.
really just put Saddam in a better situation than he was before because the presence of inspectors invites complacency and
"I said it's being taken care of, dammit. Mind your own business."
Finally, long after the fad has grown tiresome, everyone's attention turns to another scrap of dogma for the next decade.
It is time for a new day to dawn in the Blogosphere, my gnome brothers. A glorious day. A day when no longer will we
You mean everyone in America aren't like San Franciscans?
According to the president, "we cannot wait for the final proof" that Saddam Hussein's government is planning an imminent
of righteousness; and it becomes a very evil thing if it serves merely as a mask for cowardice and
conflict.
But I am thankful that at least for now, I've been able to summon that deep-seated, personal wrath so appropriate to an
and you'll get diversity in the speech by the politician, in the one by the principal who welcomes him and in the one by
Finally, long after the fad has grown tiresome, everyone's attention turns to another scrap of dogma for the next decade.
So welcome. If this is the first and/or only post you can see, it means I haven't imported my archives from Blogspot yet,
Anyway, take the new site for a test drive. Take her easy on the clutch and go steady on the hills, and I think you'll
Another Australian tourist, 18-year-old Rachel Hughes, said she and her boyfriend had just arrived in Kuta when the blast
It seems the Muslim version of a slander suit is cutting off your head. Now when I read this I was shocked, just shocked
last update : 24-5-2013
