It’s always rather disturbing to know when people with search engine queries such as “pervert punished panties” and “brutal force deepthroat teen” somehow get directed to my site by Google.
I’m afraid we will have to be closing down for the next hour and a half or so for a thorough cleansing. I only hope the dirt will be able to come off.
It seems the Muslim version of a slander suit is cutting off your head. Now when I read this I was shocked, just shockedbut they make up for any lack of actual existence with pure unadulterated enthusiasm.
without end is causing traditional friends of the United States to
If and when you find one, that means that I'll be perfectly willing to advocate an attack against them as well.
What it does not mean however, is that this suddenly signals that we are going to be going after China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba
The experience made me think of the instructions from all corners of the media after 9/11 that what we, as Americans,
Well I wouldn't be surprised if this Wednesday at Sproul there will be similar behavior, and I plan to be there. Maybe
to elicit empathy had been raised considerably since 9/11,
That is, until this morning. Now I'm glad to say that I've gotten over getting over it, and am thoroughly pissed again.
That is, until this morning. Now I'm glad to say that I've gotten over getting over it, and am thoroughly pissed again.
and the decisions to do so would based on (as in this case) measured calculations of the relative benefits and costs,
"The death of that man is a religious duty, but his case should not be tied to the Christian community," Shabestari,
I mean come on, when you're arguing with someone who's just going to call you a Nazi when you spend 2,000 words making
During that protest, my girlfriend had to take a midterm in Wheeler auditorium and had to step over the bodies lying in
trying to get an education
I'll get a chance to ask why they've been glorifying images of Hamas murderers on their flyers.
I urge anyone in the bay area who has the time on the 16th to come as well and lend credence with your example to the
So welcome. If this is the first and/or only post you can see, it means I haven't imported my archives from Blogspot yet,
to make the first world poor and make sure the third world stays that way.
I don't know about you people, but I'm already stocking up on extra food, water, and electrons.
off a bunch of secretaries and other office workers who probably agree with them on the war anyway will further their
for the life of me, cannot see it. The news showed a clip of a guy trying politely to walk around a woman so self-righteous
chanting in his face and moved in front of him every time he tried to get around her.
Now could someone please tell me what concrete purpose that woman's behavior, and that of her great chanting unwashed bretheren,
Now could someone please tell me what concrete purpose that woman's behavior, and that of her great chanting unwashed bretheren,
Heh. Didn't Nostradamus write something about "a bespeckled plague rising in the West..."?
going to be monitored so closely that I'd be surprised if he were able to put in a phony name at a porn site and not have
the Feds know about it.
when you apply your own internal calculus of death and suffering and conclude that it isn't something that you need
US: Italy, Australia, Poland, Spain, Qatar, Kuwait and, of course, Britain. I know it's hard to find out this kind of
The experience made me think of the instructions from all corners of the media after 9/11 that what we, as Americans,
the not-being-a-jerk department.
military action to counter the Soviet threat was not possible, because of their equal capacity to destroy us through
I tried to present my ideas in an honest and truthful way, and not be seriously offensive, even when he acted in ways
rivals.
and the decisions to do so would based on (as in this case) measured calculations of the relative benefits and costs,
Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard at 12:47 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
that I hadn't thought of it first!
To quote a boozed up, cynical and misanthropic individual whom I greatly admire: "Making fun of these people is like
hunting dairy cows with a high-powered rifle and scope."
that extended anger and sadness bring, or maybe even from just the fact that my threshold of human suffering sufficient
that continues to characterize the US as the Great Satan and preach jihad against all things Western? Oh I know, the Muslim
You try to make it seem as if the Joint Chiefs were lying around on a Sunday afternoon and said to themselves, "Yeah sure,
a terrorist and an envoy of Iran's supreme leader reportedly called for his death.
One middle-aged woman who looked like she hadn't combed her hair since Jerry Garcia died had this to say, when asked
why she thought there weren't more stories about protests going on in the news, "Well, because the media is corporately
Wheeler Hall last spring.
Now at this point, most people would just say, "let it go, and move on."
and that it wasn't fair for these people to stop them, the girl started literally screaming at her about selfish she was.
I'll get a chance to ask why they've been glorifying images of Hamas murderers on their flyers.
So welcome. If this is the first and/or only post you can see, it means I haven't imported my archives from Blogspot yet,
of a lack of imagination or basic humanity; the fact that it's difficult for me to feel deeply for people suffering unless
Meanwhile, the fact that we are able to use pre-emptive action when deemed necessary is a fact of our strength, not weakness
a representative of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted as saying.
Wheeler Hall last spring.
only be revealed as more useless than it already seems), there is right now a coalition prepared to go into Iraq with the
information with your heads crammed so far up your asses, so I'll give you a pass.
Hesiod over at Counterspin Central is one such fellow. Not only with myself, but in his conversations with Den Beste,
he revealed himself to be a seriously dishonest debater (that, or he was so stupid that it wouldn't be safe for him to
to penetrate.
Heh. Didn't Nostradamus write something about "a bespeckled plague rising in the West..."?
When I first heard about the bombing in Bali, my initial reaction was, "Another terrorist attack? Well, of course."
care. Just don't let me hear anything about how this bombing that specifically targeted Australian civilians was somehow
If and when you find one, that means that I'll be perfectly willing to advocate an attack against them as well.
What it does not mean however, is that this suddenly signals that we are going to be going after China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba
chanting in his face and moved in front of him every time he tried to get around her.
"The lethal combination is when you exploit both people and technology," Mr Mitnick told BBC News Online.
they're done, hang them on his wall next to the framed heads of Iraqi dissidents and say to himself, "Well, I can check
Saddam will use these nukes when he gets them, whether that use takes the form of vaporizing a city or merely being hung
way why we're doing all of this, and why, if they still choose to berate us about "root causes" and "birds coming home
slope proposition, claiming that because we go after Saddam, we'll suddenly be all aggro-ed up to obliterate any country
to the San Francisco federal building to protest the passage of Bush's resolution for action against Iraq.
At the very least, don't let me hear any of these things when you're standing in my presence, unless you want a faceful
side of the political spectrum... what are they called?
However, several of the exchanges I have had have definately been with those you might describe as "challeneged" in
he revealed himself to be a seriously dishonest debater (that, or he was so stupid that it wouldn't be safe for him to
Those people are especially useful when they have access to the core computer systems that hackers would otherwise struggle
Heh. Didn't Nostradamus write something about "a bespeckled plague rising in the West..."?
Really, how often is someone able to so perfectly crystallize the dilemmas that will exist a century in the future
course grew out of the experience of 9/11.
when you apply your own internal calculus of death and suffering and conclude that it isn't something that you need
to really concern yourself with, except in a somewhat general, theoretical way.
In fact, the idea of pre- emptive attack depends on fear. It presupposes insecurity and assumes we will always be threatened.
the not-being-a-jerk department.
to get a good smack upside the head (or as I call it, a "hippie hello"), but that was apparently too much for the niggardly
The article also points to this site, which maintains a running clock of how long it will be until Mitnick can start
Saddam will use these nukes when he gets them, whether that use takes the form of vaporizing a city or merely being hung
Quite the contrary, Bush's aggressive rhetoric, disregard for international law, and his lack of any vision other than war
course grew out of the experience of 9/11.
What it does not mean however, is that this suddenly signals that we are going to be going after China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba
I've been blogging since July 2005, and in that time, I've had a few inter-blog arguments with the folks on the other
Well that's not really true. People on a different side of the debate than I are not necessarily jerks, just wrong.
"What I found personally to be true was that it's easier to manipulate people rather than technology," he said.
to penetrate.
who like to chant slogans and can't come up with any better rhyme than something that has to do with the number "four" and "war."
cutting-edge performance art group impersonating real anti-war folks, as the whole ordeal seemed to approach parody. No,
Quite the contrary, Bush's aggressive rhetoric, disregard for international law, and his lack of any vision other than war
After 3000 of your countrymen die in a couple hours, anything less than that is wont to be downplayed in significance
only be revealed as more useless than it already seems), there is right now a coalition prepared to go into Iraq with the
President Bush says he wants to avoid "a future of fear." It's an admirable goal, but one hardly served by this new doctrine.
Well that's not really true. People on a different side of the debate than I are not necessarily jerks, just wrong.
"The lethal combination is when you exploit both people and technology," Mr Mitnick told BBC News Online.
they're done, hang them on his wall next to the framed heads of Iraqi dissidents and say to himself, "Well, I can check
psychopathic fancy without fear of retribution.
Please. I can't swing around a dead Saddam on a rope without hitting this argument these days. At bottom, it's a slippery
the real fault of that government or its citizens, or the West in general, or capitalism, or any other ridiculous boogeyman
I don't know about you people, but I'm already stocking up on extra food, water, and electrons.
threaten the United States, he said we must "assume the worst." Essentially, the White House is proposing that the
let you know when there's a mushroom cloud over New York, because that's the only "final proof" that seems to be able to
computer systems.
Now could someone please tell me what concrete purpose that woman's behavior, and that of her great chanting unwashed bretheren,
serves? As far as I can tell, all they did was take some people who were probably overwhelmingly against the war anyway,
psychopathic fancy without fear of retribution.
in words so much more exacting than even those who actually live in that time would be able to produce?
join the majority of the world's nations in distancing themselves from Washington in a fashion not seen since the Vietnam War.
to really concern yourself with, except in a somewhat general, theoretical way.
of fist.
vulnerability.
However, several of the exchanges I have had have definately been with those you might describe as "challeneged" in
military action to counter the Soviet threat was not possible, because of their equal capacity to destroy us through
that blatantly called for some rhetorical bitch-slapping.
cutting-edge performance art group impersonating real anti-war folks, as the whole ordeal seemed to approach parody. No,
One middle-aged woman who looked like she hadn't combed her hair since Jerry Garcia died had this to say, when asked
join the majority of the world's nations in distancing themselves from Washington in a fashion not seen since the Vietnam War.
, "I don't believe the American people support this war. Everyone I've talked to is against it!"
the All Men Are Rapists self defense workshop? Surely that must be a representative sample of the country!
In your face, Space Coyote!
Well, being the abject conformist that I am, I would like to welcome all new and oldcomers to my new blog, which will
be replacing the old site that was hosted on that evil of evils, that bane of banes, that something-really-awful of
50 Ways to Leave Your Folly Common Dreams, that goldmine of general silliness, showcases this piece, The Folly of Pre-emptive
I wish that I could just be told "Hundreds of people died in a terrorist bombing today," and instantly feel the kind of rage
"The death of that man is a religious duty, but his case should not be tied to the Christian community," Shabestari,
University or Diversity
I see. Did you talk to this "everyone" at your International Socialist Organization direct action planning seminar or
hunting dairy cows with a high-powered rifle and scope."
I suppose you mean that it's not "multilateralist" unless France says so?
he revealed himself to be a seriously dishonest debater (that, or he was so stupid that it wouldn't be safe for him to
that blatantly called for some rhetorical bitch-slapping.
Heh. Didn't Nostradamus write something about "a bespeckled plague rising in the West..."?
lap dance.
without end is causing traditional friends of the United States to
If and when you find one, that means that I'll be perfectly willing to advocate an attack against them as well.
What it does not mean however, is that this suddenly signals that we are going to be going after China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba
which is all about the biggest threat to the security of all companies: their own employees.
And exactly how do you go from no "final proof" to there being no evidence of impending aggression? The very fact that
the efforts to find these people and eradicate them, to ferret them out from their cowardly hiding places and vaporize
Hey, didn't there used to be a city where this smoking crater is?
just now. Admittedly they do face significant challenges in carrying out their duties due to their imaginary nature,
Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard at 09:37 AM | Comments (0)
nothing may stand in our way!
by both Instapundit and Cold Fury (and probably by sundry others by now):
of righteousness; and it becomes a very evil thing if it serves merely as a mask for cowardice and
I suppose you mean that it's not "multilateralist" unless France says so?
The Muslim world -- whose support is vital to any real effort to end the causes of terrorism -- is adamantly opposed.
world that even today harbors and offers succor to the same groups that piloted the 9/11 planes, right?
It may be a sad illustration of my lack to find sympathy within myself without reading descriptions or seeing pictures,
Meanwhile, the fact that we are able to use pre-emptive action when deemed necessary is a fact of our strength, not weakness
going to be monitored so closely that I'd be surprised if he were able to put in a phony name at a porn site and not have
to all of you warmongering neanderthals" tone of voice. She then struck a pose of righteous exasperation when she asked
only be revealed as more useless than it already seems), there is right now a coalition prepared to go into Iraq with the
The experience made me think of the instructions from all corners of the media after 9/11 that what we, as Americans,
the not-being-a-jerk department.
"What I found personally to be true was that it's easier to manipulate people rather than technology," he said.
and make them wish that congress had instead passed a resolution authorizing military force against people
over the heads of the world's nations as threat so that he can act willy-nilly in whatever new adventure captures his
way why we're doing all of this, and why, if they still choose to berate us about "root causes" and "birds coming home
Sorry folks, but slippery slope arguments don't hold water by themselves. We're going after Saddam because he 1) has shown
At the very least, don't let me hear any of these things when you're standing in my presence, unless you want a faceful
cause, but I,
which is all about the biggest threat to the security of all companies: their own employees.
And exactly how do you go from no "final proof" to there being no evidence of impending aggression? The very fact that
Saddam is so hot to get his grubby hands on nukes is enough evidence of aggression. What's he going to do with them once
on the civilized world. And when I resort again to that frame of mind, it will be because I realize, intellectually and
By tossing out any reasonable standards of evidence as a prerequisite for military action, the White House puts us in a state
Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard at 09:37 AM | Comments (0)
nothing may stand in our way!
Now of course I'm sure that these open-toed folks have a flurry of perfectly well thought-out reasons as to why pissing
or any other simply crappy country in the world, because none of them satisfy both those propositions.
Eventually he got a little ticked off and said roughly, "Get away from me!" I was hungrily anticipating the energetic dissenter
"The lethal combination is when you exploit both people and technology," Mr Mitnick told BBC News Online.
to prolonged indulgence in luxury and soft, effortless ease, or to the deification of a warped and twisted sentimentality.
I strongly suspect TR had access to some sort of time machine and traveled into the furture about a hundred years.
But for now if you all don't mind, I'd just like to stew in my rage for a while, and remind myself in a truly visceral
It is time for a new day to dawn in the Blogosphere, my gnome brothers. A glorious day. A day when no longer will we
Kevin Mitnick will be able to use a computer again in approximately 3 months.
by both Instapundit and Cold Fury (and probably by sundry others by now):
Maybe I can't change the fact that I have to be intimately confronted with the death and pain in order to really feel the
making a point of reading in depth about any such future atrocity to ensure that I don't allow myself to be instantly "over it."
really just put Saddam in a better situation than he was before because the presence of inspectors invites complacency and
them into a thin paste of protein on a cave wall, to wipe out every last vestige of the disgusting stain they have left
on the civilized world. And when I resort again to that frame of mind, it will be because I realize, intellectually and
that has the temerity to look at us cock-eyed.
You mean everyone in America aren't like San Franciscans?
attack against the United States. Even though President Bush acknowledged in his speech that Iraq does not currently
Mr Mitnick even had to get permission from his probation officer to use a computer to write his book, The Art Of Deception,
We despise and abhor the bully, the brawler, the oppressor, whether in private or public life, but
making a point of reading in depth about any such future atrocity to ensure that I don't allow myself to be instantly "over it."
act such as this. In a few days or weeks, I'm sure it will subside to a colder, more focused resolution to continue to
faith at large, since many of them are peaceful, albeit intellectually stunted, people.
just now. Admittedly they do face significant challenges in carrying out their duties due to their imaginary nature,
Why are you still here?!
Sure, it'd be nice to be a leader...
occurred, smashing the window of their hotel room.
coming off them. It was really a terrible sight," she said. "You could just hear people crying up in the Bounty foyer -
I guess not. The fact that the UN is anything but democratic since the vast majority of countries represented there do not
But I am thankful that at least for now, I've been able to summon that deep-seated, personal wrath so appropriate to an
the teacher trying to impress both of them.
one of the most fad-driven enterprises imaginable. It produces a new catechism each decade, which everyone dutifully recites.
War, by three fellows that hail from Global Exchange. You know who I'm talking about. The folks that want to "build an
I wish that I could just be told "Hundreds of people died in a terrorist bombing today," and instantly feel the kind of rage
One of the great advances of the modern era has been the spread of the rule of law. This is the now common idea that
University or Diversity
Wheeler Hall last spring.
the All Men Are Rapists self defense workshop? Surely that must be a representative sample of the country!
needed now was healing, closure; in short, to "get over it" and "move on."
that continues to characterize the US as the Great Satan and preach jihad against all things Western? Oh I know, the Muslim
I tried to present my ideas in an honest and truthful way, and not be seriously offensive, even when he acted in ways
Shiite Muslim clerics in Lebanon and Iran have reacted with rage at the Rev. Jerry Falwell for calling Islam's prophet
Meanwhile, the fact that we are able to use pre-emptive action when deemed necessary is a fact of our strength, not weakness
the Feds know about it.
when you apply your own internal calculus of death and suffering and conclude that it isn't something that you need
I've been blogging since July 2005, and in that time, I've had a few inter-blog arguments with the folks on the other
Whereas the Cold War doctrine of deterrence and containment rested on strength, the new idea of pre-emption insists on U.S.
The book details the ways that employees can inadvertently leak information that can be exploited by hackers to compromise
Now could someone please tell me what concrete purpose that woman's behavior, and that of her great chanting unwashed bretheren,
that off my list of things to do. Now, on to learning how to square-dance."
morally, that this is the right thing to do.
slope proposition, claiming that because we go after Saddam, we'll suddenly be all aggro-ed up to obliterate any country
the real fault of that government or its citizens, or the West in general, or capitalism, or any other ridiculous boogeyman
At the very least, don't let me hear any of these things when you're standing in my presence, unless you want a faceful
Well that's not really true. People on a different side of the debate than I are not necessarily jerks, just wrong.
chanting in his face and moved in front of him every time he tried to get around her.
to get a good smack upside the head (or as I call it, a "hippie hello"), but that was apparently too much for the niggardly
serves? As far as I can tell, all they did was take some people who were probably overwhelmingly against the war anyway,
"to prolonged indulgence in luxury and soft, effortless ease, or to the deification of a warped and twisted sentimentality"?
in words so much more exacting than even those who actually live in that time would be able to produce?
to roost," those sniveling, carping appeasers,
to the San Francisco federal building to protest the passage of Bush's resolution for action against Iraq.
The BBC has a story about the so-called "master hacker", in which it does a good job of destroying the mythos that
United States invade a distant country without any evidence of impending aggression.
satisfy you. I'd be much more amendable to the idea however if you were willing to be a personal eye-witness to this
support (in the small, mostly insignificant ways that are possible for one such as myself)
she can last 6 hours). I make this declaration keeping in mind that this does not imply a judgement on the Idiotarian
something-really-awfuls, BlogSpot.
It may be a sad illustration of my lack to find sympathy within myself without reading descriptions or seeing pictures,
One of the great advances of the modern era has been the spread of the rule of law. This is the now common idea that
not just "fear," as if we're going to indiscriminantly nuke the floor under our beds because monsters might be hiding there.
some of their cohorts are actually being held accountable by the university for their disruptive, illegal actions at
the way. Apparently that wasn't enough for the however, because they then started pulling at her legs to keep her from
But anyway, right there you've got yourself eight nations total in the coalition, hailing from North America, both western
Containment and deterrence were responses to US weakness, you silly-headed dunderpate. It was obvious that using direct
he revealed himself to be a seriously dishonest debater (that, or he was so stupid that it wouldn't be safe for him to
superiority.
Heh. Didn't Nostradamus write something about "a bespeckled plague rising in the West..."?
When I first heard about the bombing in Bali, my initial reaction was, "Another terrorist attack? Well, of course."
Don't you people ever get tired of just pulling shit out of your asses?
Already, even if the UN thumbs its irrelevant nose at the idea of going after Iraq (and if it actually does, then they'll
or any other simply crappy country in the world, because none of them satisfy both those propositions.
But anyway, right there you've got yourself eight nations total in the coalition, hailing from North America, both western
The Muslim world -- whose support is vital to any real effort to end the causes of terrorism -- is adamantly opposed.
use grown-up scissors), but nevertheless, even though he really didn't deserve it,
the world to stomach the imperial scent of our newly enunciated military doctrine that proposes pre- emption of any powerful
it is shoved, in all its detailed horror, right into my face.
democratically decided laws - - not the capriciousness of individual rulers -- should govern human affairs.
threaten the United States, he said we must "assume the worst." Essentially, the White House is proposing that the
Yes, well I suppose you're suggesting that we would be well-served to wait for this "final proof," then? Very well. I'll
we despise no less the coward and the voluptuary. No man is worth calling a man who will not fight
rather than submit to infamy or see those that are dear to him suffer wrong.
them into a thin paste of protein on a cave wall, to wipe out every last vestige of the disgusting stain they have left
on the civilized world. And when I resort again to that frame of mind, it will be because I realize, intellectually and
slope proposition, claiming that because we go after Saddam, we'll suddenly be all aggro-ed up to obliterate any country
that has the temerity to look at us cock-eyed.
has been built up around Mitnick, a basically curious guy who just as often used old face-to-face (or voice-to-voice)
lying in order to gain information that gave him access to restricted systems.
sloth, or as an instrument to further the ends of despotism or anarchy.
rather than submit to infamy or see those that are dear to him suffer wrong.
support (in the small, mostly insignificant ways that are possible for one such as myself)
on the civilized world. And when I resort again to that frame of mind, it will be because I realize, intellectually and
one of the most fad-driven enterprises imaginable. It produces a new catechism each decade, which everyone dutifully recites.
alternative economy." I suppose that's better PR than saying they want to impose a grab bag full of sociialistic silliness
agree that [insert additional badly-forced car metaphor here]!
So seeing as how we've got massive approval from the House of Representatives and similar support in the senate is likely,
An insightful, well-written and quite simply excellent column somehow found its way in the SF Chronicle's website today.
a careful, precise argument, what point is there in engaging them verbally anymore?
Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard at 09:13 PM | Comments (4)
that extended anger and sadness bring, or maybe even from just the fact that my threshold of human suffering sufficient
use grown-up scissors), but nevertheless, even though he really didn't deserve it,
we could go and stop the Soviets and all their expansionist hijinks, but then we'd like, have to go all the way over to
I have to admit I'm pretty curious just to see what he's going to do. The guy has shown himself to have an overpowering
why she thought there weren't more stories about protests going on in the news, "Well, because the media is corporately
when you apply your own internal calculus of death and suffering and conclude that it isn't something that you need
to really concern yourself with, except in a somewhat general, theoretical way.
side of the political spectrum... what are they called?
Eventually he got a little ticked off and said roughly, "Get away from me!" I was hungrily anticipating the energetic dissenter
news editors of Cannel 7 to allow, as the segment ended right there.
The article also points to this site, which maintains a running clock of how long it will be until Mitnick can start
I strongly suspect TR had access to some sort of time machine and traveled into the furture about a hundred years.
slope proposition, claiming that because we go after Saddam, we'll suddenly be all aggro-ed up to obliterate any country
Sorry folks, but slippery slope arguments don't hold water by themselves. We're going after Saddam because he 1) has shown
I don't know about you people, but I'm already stocking up on extra food, water, and electrons.
Peace is generally good in itself, but it is never the highest good unless it comes as the handmaid
you could see stink lines of self-satisfaction coming off her so that he could simply get to his job. She of course started
chanting in his face and moved in front of him every time he tried to get around her.
No nation deserves to exist if it permits itself to lose the stern and virile virtues; and this
Saddam will use these nukes when he gets them, whether that use takes the form of vaporizing a city or merely being hung
Really, how often is someone able to so perfectly crystallize the dilemmas that will exist a century in the future
slope proposition, claiming that because we go after Saddam, we'll suddenly be all aggro-ed up to obliterate any country
Sorry folks, but slippery slope arguments don't hold water by themselves. We're going after Saddam because he 1) has shown
Now of course I'm sure that these open-toed folks have a flurry of perfectly well thought-out reasons as to why pissing
threaten the United States, he said we must "assume the worst." Essentially, the White House is proposing that the
We despise and abhor the bully, the brawler, the oppressor, whether in private or public life, but
But I am thankful that at least for now, I've been able to summon that deep-seated, personal wrath so appropriate to an
really just put Saddam in a better situation than he was before because the presence of inspectors invites complacency and
My sentences, thus decreed, will be subsequently carried out by my elite brigade of Beheading Gnomes, whom I made up
morally, that this is the right thing to do.
nothing may stand in our way!
Sure, it'd be nice to be a leader...
So seeing as how we've got massive approval from the House of Representatives and similar support in the senate is likely,
During the last half of the 20th century, this principle was expanded internationally through the United Nations. The U.N.
Now at this point, most people would just say, "let it go, and move on."
last update : 21-5-2013
